October 11, 2006

Pigs as Angels?

KinnellGalway Kinnell's A New Selected Poems appeared in 2000. He was awarded both the National Book Award and the Pulitzer Prize for his first Collected Poems in 1980. In the autumn of 2001 he was interviewed by Elizabeth Lund, poetry editor of The Christian Science Monitor, and in her resulting account there is the following passage:

"Whether he's writing about his family or describing the loveliness of sows, Kinnell's work reveals affection for creatures both great and small. 'The other animals are the angels. Human babies are the angels.'

"A pig as an angel?

"'I try to see past the usual clichés about things,' he smiles.  'Pig' is a pejorative word, but if you get to know them, get a feeling for them, you see that they have an extraordinary beauty. When creatures don't have an extraordinary beauty, it's because the person in contact with them is not seeing it. I feel more and more in love with other creatures as I get older.'"

On another occasion earlier in 2001 he said:

I don't think of myself as a "nature poet." I don't recognize the distinction between nature poetry and—what would be the other thing?—human civilization poetry? We are creatures of the earth. All the creatures have their intricate ways of living on earth. Humans are unique in one respect: we've taken over. We've taken over so successfully that we've become a threat to many of the other creatures and even a danger to the earth itself, so that's why I don't think of myself as a "nature poet." Poems about other creatures may have political and social implications for us.


St. Francis and the Sow


The bud
stands for all things,
even for those things that don’t flower,
for everything flowers, from within, of self-blessing;
though sometimes it is necessary
to reteach a thing its loveliness,
to put a hand on its brow
of the flower
and retell it in words and in touch
it is lovely
until it flowers again from within, of self-blessing;
as Saint Francis
put his hand on the creased forehead
of the sow, and told her in words and in touch
blessings of earth on the sow, and the sow
began remembering all down her thick length,
from the earthen snout all the way
through the fodder and slops to the spiritual curl of the tail,
from the hard spininess spiked out from the spine
down through the great broken heart
to the sheer blue milken dreaminess spurting and shuddering
from the fourteen teats into the fourteen mouths sucking and
            blowing beneath them:
the long, perfect loveliness of sow.


October 10, 2006

Three poems of Denise Levertov

(for Gil and Liz Bailie)

Denise_levertov Denise Levertov, photo by David Geier

Denise Levertov's last volume of poems, This Great Unknowing: Last Poems, was posthumously published by New Directions in 1999. She died from complications of lymphoma two years before at the age of 74. Her father was a Hasidic Jew who converted to Christianity and became an Anglican parson in England. Levertov came to the U.S. in 1948 at the age of 25. She was a major voice in American poetry for over forty years. Among her persistent themes, as Robert Haas has written, were "the brokenness of the world, its violence and injustice, and her longing for wholeness, the longing that sent her back to her Christian roots at the end of her life." The first poem reproduced below, "Aware," is the last she wrote. "The Fountain" was written in the 1960s, "I learned that her name was Proverb" twenty years later, so these three poems span some thirty years of writing.

In a final interview only two months before her death, Levertov said, "There's a lot of dependence on technology today, and a willful ignorance that it's messing up resources, may end up destroying life on this planet, and then we'll have to start over without it. Our ethical development does not match our technological development. This sense of spiritual hunger is something of a counterforce or unconscious reaction to all that technological euphoria....When you're really caught up in writing a poem, it can be a form of prayer. I'm not very good at praying, but what I experience when I'm writing a poem is close to prayer. I feel it in different degrees and not with every poem. But in certain ways writing is a form of prayer."

She once wrote that she found "certain analogies, and also interaction, between the journey of art and the journey of faith," and in an essay written in 1984, "A Poet's View," she said that the "acknowledgement and celebration of mystery probably constitutes the most consistent theme of my poetry ..."

"Because it is a matter of which I am conscious, it is possible, however imprecisely, to call it an intellectual position; but it is one which emphasizes the incapacity of reason alone (much though I delight in elegant logic) to comprehend experience, and considers Imagination the chief of human faculties. It must therefore be by the exercise of that faculty that one moves toward faith, and possibly by its failure that one rejects it as delusion. Poems present their testimony as circumstantial evidence, not as closing argument. Where Wallace Stevens says, "God and the imagination are one," I would say that the imagination, which synergizes intellect, emotion and instinct, is the perceptive organ through which it is possible, though not inevitable, to experience God."

I believe that is an important statement about the centrality of imagination in spiritual life, in our capacity as artists, scientists or parents--as human beings--to realize ourselves and truly to embrace our fellowship with creation. Imagination, as Levertov uncommonly recognizes, is a faculty of perception. It can be terribly misused--think, after all, of the inhumane ways we have synthesized "intellect, emotion and instinct"--but without its creative exercise we remain, as Hasidic legend has it, imprisoned "as in a block, so that [our] hands and feet cannot stretch themselves and the head lies on the knees." That is suffering, and that is a posture of prayer.

Aware

When I found the door

I found the vine leaves

speaking among themselves in abundant

whispers.

My presence made them

hush their green breath,

embarrassed, the way

humans stand up, buttoning their jackets,

acting as if they were leaving anyway, as if

the conversation had ended

just before you arrived.

I liked

the glimpse I had, though,

of their obscure

gestures. I liked the sound

of such private voices. Next time

I'll move like cautious sunlight, open

the door by fractions, eavesdrop

peacefully.


The Fountain

Don’t say, don’t say there is no water
to solace the dryness at our hearts.
I have seen

the fountain springing out of the rock wall
and you drinking there. And I too
before your eyes

found footholds and climbed
to drink the cool water.

The woman of that place, shading her eyes,
frowned as she watched—but not because
she grudged the water,

only because she was waiting
to see we drank our fill and were
refreshed.

Don’t say, don’t say there is no water.
That fountain is there among its scalloped
green and gray stones,

it is still there and always there
with its quiet song and strange power
to spring in us,
up and out through the rock.



'I learned that her name was Proverb'

And the secret names
of all we meet who lead us deeper
into our labyrinth
of valleys and mountains, twisting valleys
and steeper mountains—
their hidden names are always,
like Proverb, promises.
Rune, Omen, Fable, Parable,
those we meet for only
one crucial moment, gaze to gaze,
or for years know and don’t recognize

but of whom later a word
sings back to us
as if from high among leaves,
still near but beyond sight

drawing us from tree to tree
towards the time and the unknown place
where we shall know
what it is to arrive.

Annie Dillard on Silence

Rock_and_grass_3 Preface: This is a small and treasured collection saved from the earlier incarnation of Reckonings. Annie Dillard's work, as much as any with which I'm familiar, shatters efforts to categorize. Our habits of dividing our lives into manageable pieces are often useful, but it's necessary--regularly, I believe--to be reminded that the membranes separating those pieces are fragile and permeable, that such categories can be mischievous as well as helpful and possess surprising arbitrariness-- and indeed that those pieces are ultimately fragments of a whole embracing more than we can know, but perhaps not more than we can apprehend. Such are the kind of thoughts that time with Annie Dillard inspires.


I. Introduction


It is raining. A soft, warm June rain, the kind I know will pause now and then but last all day. The stream is high, the mountains hidden in mist. I am quiet in this old house. The silence is complete except for the sound of the stream. My dog sleeps behind me, at the head of the stairs, so I won't leave without her noticing and coming along. There are also two Maine coon cats somewhere. When they're in a playful mood they sound like thunder ricocheting off the walls, but it's evidently nap time.

I've taken my collection of Annie Dillard's books from the shelf, and have been looking through them: partly, I suppose, because I think she too would enjoy this place and its quiet. At the top of the pile is the collection of story-essays whose title has remained most vividly in my memory over the years, Teaching a Stone to Talk. I notice on the flyleaf, with affectionate memory, that it was given to me on my birthday in 1984 by an old friend in Vermont's northland. The pages have begun to turn brown, and bear the usual underlinings and marginalia (even, I admit, a few dog-ears) of most of the books that have engaged me in conversation. The cover has lost its paste and, like a manila folder, only loosely embraces the text.

Dillard wrote the title essay and perhaps others in the volume, including the third I include here, "A Field of Silence," while living alone on an island in the Pacific Northwest. "Living Like Weasels" was the first of her essays to cast its spell upon me. Eighteen years later I saw my first weasel in the wild. The wait was worth it.

Here is the beginning of "Teaching a Stone to Talk."



II. Teaching a Stone to Talk


(excerpt)



The island where I live is peopled with cranks like myself. In a cedar-shake shack on a cliff--but we all live like this--is a man in his thirties who lives alone with a stone he is trying to teach to talk.

Wisecracks on the topic abound, as you might expect, but they are made as it were perfunctorily, and mostly by the young. For in fact, almost everyone here respects what Larry is doing, as do I, which is why I am protecting his (or her) privacy, and confusing for you the details. It could be, for instance, a pinch of sand he is teaching to talk, or a prolonged northerly, or any one of a number of waves. But it is, in fact, I assure you, a stone. It is--for I have seen it--a palm sized oval beach cobble whose dark gray is cut by a band of white which runs around and, presumably, through it; such stones we call "wishing stones," for reasons obscure but not, I think, unimaginable.

He keeps it on a shelf. Usually the stone lies protected by a square of untanned leather, like a canary asleep under its cloth. Larry removes the cover for the stone's lessons, or more accurately, I should say, for the ritual or rituals which they perform together several times a day.

No one knows what goes on at these sessions, least of all myself, for I know Larry but slightly, and that owing only to a mix-up in our mail. I assume that like any other meaningful effort, the ritual involves sacrifice, the suppression of self-consciousness, and a certain tilt of the will, so that the will becomes transparent and hollow, a channel for the work. I wish him well. It is a noble work, and beats, from any angle, selling shoes.

Reports differ on precisely what he expects or wants the stone to say. I do not think he expects the stone to speak as we do, and describe for us its long life and many, or few, sensations. I think instead that he is trying to teach it to say a single word, such as "cup," or "uncle." For this purpose he has not, as some have seriously suggested, carved the stone a little mouth, or furnished it in any way with a pocket of air which it might then expel. Rather--and I think he is wise in this--he plans to initiate his son, who is now an infant living with Larry's estranged wife, into the work, so that it may continue and bear fruit after his death.


With that perhaps improbable beginning, Dillard embarks on a meditation about nature's silence. It is, she says, "its one remark, and every flake of world is a chip off that old mute and immutable block." It is not that she ignores the manifold sounds of the natural world; she calls them silence because we do not hear. "We are here to witness....The silence is all there is. It is the alpha and the omega. It is God's brooding over the face of the waters; it is the blended note of the ten thousand things, the whine of wings. You take a step in the right direction to pray to this silence, and even to address the prayer to 'World.' Distinctions blur. Quit your tents. Pray without ceasing."



III. Living Like Weasels


(excerpt)



A weasel is wild. Who knows what he thinks? He sleeps in his underground den, his tail draped over his nose. Sometimes he lives in his den for two days without leaving. Outside, he stalks rabbits, mice, muskrats, and birds, killing more bodies than he can eat warm, and often dragging the carcasses home. Obedient to instinct, he bites his prey at the neck, either splitting the jugular vein at the throat or crunching the brain at the base of the skull, and he does not let go. One naturalist refused to kill a weasel who was socketed into his hand deeply as a rattlesnake. The man could in no way pry the tiny weasel off, and he had to walk half a mile to water, the weasel dangling from his palm, and soak him off like a stubborn label.

And once, says Ernest Thompson Seton--once, a man shot an eagle out of the sky. He examined the eagle and found the dry skull of a weasel fixed by the jaws to his throat. The supposition is that the eagle had pounced on the weasel and the weasel swiveled and bit as instinct taught him, tooth to neck, and nearly won. I would like to have seen that eagle from the air a few weeks or months before he was shot: was the whole weasel still attached to his feathered throat, a fur pendant? Or did the eagle eat what he could reach, gutting the living weasel with his talons before his breast, bending his beak, cleaning the beautiful airborne bones?

I have been reading about weasels because I saw one last week. I startled a weasel who startled me, and we exchanged a long glance.

Twenty minutes from my house, through the woods by the quarry and across the highway, is Hollins Pond, a remarkable piece of shallowness, where I like to go at sunset and sit on a tree trunk. Hollins Pond is also called Murray's Pond; it covers two acres of bottomland near Tinker Creek with six inches of water and six thousand  lily pads. In winter, brown-and-white steers stand in the middle of it, merely dampening their hooves; from the distant shore they look like miracle itself, complete with miracle's nonchalance. Now, in summer, the steers are gone. The water lilies have blossomed and spread to a green horizontal plane that is terra firma to plodding blackbirds, and tremulous ceiling to black leeches, crayfish, and carp.

This is, mind you, suburbia. It is a five-minute walk in three directions to rows of houses, though none is visible here. There's a 55 mph highway at one end of the pond, and a nesting pair of wood ducks at the other. Under every bush is a muskrat hole or a beer can. The far end is an alternating series of fields and woods, fields and woods, threaded everywhere with motorcycle tracks--in whose bare clay wild turtles lay eggs.

So. I had crossed the highway, stepped over two low barbed-wire fences, and traced the motorcycle path in all gratitude through the wild rose and poison ivy of the pond's shoreline up into high grassy fields. Then I cut down through the woods to the mossy fallen tree where I sit. This tree is excellent. It makes a dry, upholstered bench at the upper, marshy end of the pond, a plush jetty raised from the thorny shore between a shallow blue body of water and a deep blue body of sky.

The sun had just set. I was relaxed on the tree trunk, ensconced in the lap of lichen, watching the lily pads at my feet tremble and part dreamily over the thrusting path of a carp. A yellow bird appeared to my right and flew behind me. It caught my eye; I swiveled around--and the next instant, inexplicably, I was looking down at a weasel, who was looking up at me.

Weasel! I'd never seen one wild before. He was ten inches long, thin as a curve, a muscled ribbon, brown as fruitwood, soft-furred, alert. His face was fierce, small and pointed as a lizard's; he would have made a good arrowhead. There was just a dot of chin, maybe two brown hairs' worth, and then the pure white fur began that spread down his underside. He had two black eyes I didn't see, any more than you see a window.

The weasel was stunned into stillness as he was emerging from beneath an enormous shaggy wild rose bush four feet away. I was stunned into stillness twisted backward on the tree trunk. Our eyes locked, and someone threw away the key....

He disappeared. This was only last week, and already I don't remember what shattered the enchantment. I think I blinked, I think I retrieved my brain from the weasel's brain, and tried to memorize what I was seeing, and the weasel felt the yank of separation, the careening splashdown into real life and the urgent current of instinct. He vanished under the wild rose. I waited motionless, my mind suddenly full of data and my spirit with pleadings, but he didn't return.

I would like to learn, or remember, how to live. I come to Hollins Pond not so much to learn how to live as, frankly, to forget about it. That is, I don't think I can learn from a wild animal how to live in particular--shall I such warm blood, hold my tail high, walk with my footprints precisely over the prints of my hands?--but I might learn something of mindlessness, something of the purity of living in the physical senses and the dignity of living without bias or motive. The weasel lives in necessity and we live in choice, hating necessity and dying at the last ignobly in its talons. I would like to live as I should, as the weasel lives as he should. And I suspect that for me the way is like the weasel's: open to time and death painlessly, noticing everything, remembering nothing, choosing the given with a fierce and pointed will....

We could, you know. We can live any way we want. People take vows of poverty, chastity, and obedience--even of silence--by choice. The thing is to stalk your calling in a certain skilled and supple way, to locate the most tender and live spot and plug into that pulse. This is yielding, not fighting. A weasel doesn't "attack" anything; a weasel lives as he's meant to, yielding at every moment to the perfect freedom of single necessity....



IV. A Field of Silence


There is a place called "the farm" where I lived once, in a time that was very lonely. Fortunately I was unconscious of my loneliness then, and felt it only deeply, bewildered, in the half-bright way that a puppy feels pain.

I loved the place, and still do. It was an ordinary farm, a calf-raising, haymaking farm, and very beautiful. Its flat, messy pastures ran along one side of the central portion of a quarter-mile road in the 'central part of an island, an island in Puget Sound, on the Washington coast, so that from the high end of the road you could look west toward the Pacific, to the sound and its hundred islands, and from the other end--and from the farm--you could see east to the water between you and the mainland, and beyond it the mainland's mountains slicked with snow.

I liked the clutter about the place, the way everything blossomed or seeded or rusted; I liked the hundred half-finished projects, the smells, and the way the animals always broke loose. It is calming to herd animals. Often a regular rodeo breaks out--two people and a clever cow can kill a morning--but still, it is calming. You laugh for a while, exhausted, and silence is restored; the beasts are back in their pastures, the fences are not fixed but disguised as if they were fixed, ensuring the animals' temporary resignation; and a great calm descends, a lack of urgency, a sense of having to invent something to do until the next time you must run and chase cattle.
The farm seemed eternal in the crude way the earth does--extending, that is, a very long time. The farm was as old as earth, always there, as old as the island, the Platonic form of "farm," of human society itself, a piece of land eaten and replenished a billion summers, a piece of land worked on, lived on, grown over, plowed under, and stitched again and again, with fingers or with leaves, in and out and into human life's thin weave. I lived there once.


I lived there once and I have seen, from behind the barn, the long roadside pastures heaped with silence. Behind the rooster, suddenly, I saw the silence heaped on the fields like trays. That day the green hayfields supported silence evenly sown; the fields bent just so under the even pressure of silence, bearing it, palming it aloft: cleared fields, part of a land, a planet, that did not buckle beneath the heel of silence, nor split up scattered to bits, but instead lay secret, disguised as time and matter as though that were nothing, ordinary-disguised as fields like those which bear the silence only because they are spread, and the silence spreads over them, great in size.

I do not want, I think, ever to see such a sight again. That there is loneliness here I had granted, in the abstract-but not, I thought, inside the light of God's presence, inside his sanction, and signed by his name.

I lived alone in the farmhouse and rented; the owners, in their twenties, lived in another building just over the yard. I had been reading and restless for two or three days. It was morning. I had just read at breakfast an Updike story, "Packed Dirt, Churchgoing, A Dying Cat, A Traded Car," which moved me. I heard our own farmyard rooster and two or three roosters across the street screeching. I quit the house, hoping at heart to see either of the owners, but immediately to watch our rooster as he crowed.

It was Saturday morning late in the summer, in early September, clear-aired and still. I climbed the barnyard fence between the poultry and the pastures; I watched the red rooster, and the rooster, reptilian, kept one alert and alien eye on me. He pulled his extravagant neck to its maximum length, hauled himself high on his legs, stretched his beak as if he were gagging, screamed, and blinked. It was a ruckus. The din came from everywhere, and only the most rigorous application of reason could persuade me that it proceeded in its entirety from this lone and maniac bird.

After a pause, the roosters across the street started, answering the proclamation, or cranking out another round, arhythmically, interrupting. In the same way there is no pattern nor sense to the massed stridulations of cicadas; their skipped beats, enjambments, and failed alterations jangle your spirits, as though each of those thousand insects, each with identical feelings, were stubbornly deaf to the others, and loudly alone.

I shifted along the fence to see if either of the owners was coming or going. To the rooster I said nothing, but only stared. And he stared at me; we were both careful to keep the wooden fence slat from our line of sight, so that his profiled eye and my two eyes could meet. From time to time I looked beyond the pastures to learn if anyone might be seen on the road.
When I was turned away in this manner, the silence gathered and struck me. It bashed me broadside from the heavens above me like yard goods; ten acres of fallen, invisible sky choked the fields. The pastures on either side of the road turned green in a surrealistic fashion, monstrous, impeccable, as if they were holding their breaths. The roosters stopped. All the things of the world--the fields and the fencing, the road, a parked orange truck--were stricken and self-conscious. A world pressed down on their surfaces, a world battered just within their surfaces, and that real world, so near to emerging, had got stuck.


There was only silence. It was the silence of matter caught in the act and embarrassed. There were no cells moving, and yet there were cells. I could see the shape of the land, how it lay holding silence. Its poise and its stillness were unendurable, like the ring of the silence you hear in your skull when you're little and notice you're living, the ring which resumes later in life when you're sick.

There were flies buzzing over the dirt by the henhouse, moving in circles and buzzing, black dreams in chips off the one long dream, the dream of the regular world. But the silent fields were the real world, eternity's outpost in time, whose look I remembered but never like this, this God-blasted, paralyzed day. I felt myself tall and vertical, in a blue shirt, self-conscious, and wishing to die. I heard the flies again; I looked at the rooster who was frozen looking at me.

Then at last I heard whistling, human whistling far on the air, and I was not able to bear it. I looked around, heartbroken; only at the big yellow Charolais farm far up the road was there motion—a woman, I think, dressed in pink, and pushing a wheelbarrow easily over the grass. It must have been she who was whistling and heaping on top of the silence those hollow notes of song. But the slow sound of the music--the beautiful sound of the music ringing the air like a stone bell--was isolate and detached. The notes spread into the general air and became the weightier part of silence, silence's last straw. The distant woman and her wheelbarrow were flat and detached, like mechanized and pink-painted properties for a stage. I stood in pieces, afraid I was unable to move. Something had unhinged the world. The houses and roadsides and pastures were buckling under the silence. Then a Labrador, black, loped up the distant driveway, fluid and cartoonlike, toward the .pink woman. I had to try to turn away. Holiness is a force, and like the others can be resisted. It was given, but I didn't want to  see it, God or no God. It was as if God had said, "I am here, but not as you have known me. This is the look of silence, and of loneliness unendurable; it too has always been mine, and now will be yours." I was not ready for a life of sorrow, sorrow deriving from knowledge I could just as well stop at the gate.

I turned away, willful, and the whole show vanished. The realness of things disassembled. The whistling became ordinary, familiar; the air above the fields released its pressure and the fields lay hooded as before. I myself could act. Looking to the rooster I whistled to him myself, softly, and some hens appeared at the chicken house window, greeted the day, and fluttered down.

Several months later, walking past the farm on the way to a volleyball game, I remarked to a friend, by way of information, "There are angels in those fields." Angels! That silence so grave and so stricken, that choked and unbearable green! I have rarely been so surprised at something I've said. Angels! What are angels? I had never thought of angels, in any way at all.

From that time I began to think of angels. I considered that sights such as I had seen of the silence must have been shared by the people who said they saw angels. I began to review the thing I had seen that morning. My impression now of those fields is of thousands of spirits—spirits trapped, perhaps, by my refusal to call them more fully, or by the paralysis of my own spirit at that time—thousands of spirits, angels in fact, almost discernible to the eye, and whirling. If pressed I would say they were three or four feet from the ground. Only their motion was clear (clockwise, if you insist); that, and their beauty unspeakable.

There are angels in those fields, and, I presume, in all fields, and everywhere else. I would go to the lions for this conviction, to witness this fact. What all this means about perception, or language, or angels, or my own sanity, I have no idea.

October 09, 2006

Turning III: Turning and Following

Prefatory note: In much of what I write below--in this post's continuation or "extended body"--I owe so much to my reading and re-reading of Stephen Mitchell's inspired reflections on Jesus's tale of the prodigal son (in his Jeffersonian Gospel According to Jesus Christ, Harper, 1993) that it's hard, in retrospect, to pick all his thinking, his examples and imagery, from my own. I hope I've given him sufficient credit in the text as well as here. In the interest of narrative continuity, I have chosen not to clutter that portion of the text with as many quotation marks as it technically deserves. The story at its heart belongs to him, to me, and to neither of us.

When I was eleven years old I had a paper route, a beast of a paper route. It was the kind of beast that had red, predatory eyes even in the soft dawn of morning. I was folding and carrying on my bike and heaving toward peoples’ front porches a free shopping news filled from front to back with ads. That paper made up in weight for what it lacked in content. It was as if half the world had something to sell, and had chosen this particular paper to convey the news, in bold print and big colored pictures, to the other half of the world.

The bale of papers left on the corner for me to distribute was the size of a bale that might have been left for an elephant who hadn’t eaten in a week. And my route seemed to cover roughly the United States west of the Mississippi: including both the Sierras and the Rockies, if you can imagine them with tract houses cheek by cheek.

In short, if it had occurred to me to put my situation into church language—which it actually did, if you can believe it of a boy raised in a minimally observant Episcopal household—I didn’t exactly feel that I was doing God’s work.

I happened to notice one morning when my rebelliousness was reaching an intolerable pitch, that the truck which dropped off my elephantine bale of papers did so beside a long, tall and dense evergreen hedge. I realized that those six feet of dense evergreen provided adequate cover, in a large number of places, for bales even as big as mine. I convinced myself that I was doing virtually everyone a favor by depositing the bales in the hedge, and conveniently forgot that I was continuing to be paid for my labors. My freedom lasted about two weeks before somebody missed his shopping news, and I had to pull every waterlogged bale out of the hedge, and return my ill-gotten wages. My mother let me know that I was headed down the slippery slope to a life of crime.

But it’s the other part of my solution to this paper route from the Underworld that I want more to describe. Before Satan snuck in to my heart and revealed to me the irresistible hedge—while I was still trudging my rounds—I began to talk with God. At least I assumed it was God, before I later reflected on how the whole misadventure concluded. These talks were not aloud. I was too shy for that. These were silent conversations in which I mostly put questions and waited for answers. I was old enough to realize that my active imagination may have been at work, so we agreed on a secret word that only He could speak with impunity. Everybody else who tried would be instantly fried to a crisp.

I have tried, but I don’t remember much of the content of those talks, of that listening for the voice of God, that search, on ground I suppose as likely as any, for His Kingdom. I don’t think the talks had anything to do with my paper route. They touched upon the subject of fathers, present and absent (my own had died only a few months before), on fear in the nighttime, on anger and what only later I came to understand as forgiveness. I remember that we spoke of loneliness, and the kind of companionship one might experience even when one thought oneself alone. We spoke more than a little about Jesus, I think partly because I was preoccupied with fathers and sons, and because some of the stories of Jesus’s life, and the stories he told to others, had begun to exercise their mysterious hold on me.

It’s been a long time—fifty-six years, in fact—since those talks, a lot of time for puzzlement, for disbelief, for interpretation—too much time for interpretation. I’ve come to think of much that I call interpretation as close kin to whatever it was that led me into that thicket of a hedge. I’ve never lost the love of asking questions, or listening for answers, or of Jesus’s stories.
Now that I think of it, fifty-six years isn’t very long. (It may seem longer to some of you than to others.) I can talk more, and more articulately, about my confusion now than I could then. My grammar is both better and worse. For example, when I was eleven I was sure than God was a noun; now I’m as often as not inclined to think of God as a verb, and the Kingdom of God as a path rather than a destination.

When Andrew and Peter first encountered Jesus, they asked him, “Rabbi, where are you going?”; and he answered, “Follow me.”
That has always been for me one of the simplest, hardest and most moving exchanges in the Gospels. Andrew and Peter meant the question simply and literally enough. Jesus's response dramatically raised the stakes. There was no way to tell them where he was going.

There is another simple exchange: another touchingly straightforward question, and another answer that continues to echo long after it is spoken, maybe the essence of gospel, of the good news.

“....someone asked Jesus, ‘When will the kingdom of God come?’ [there’s the noun]
“Jesus said, ‘The kingdom of God will not come if you watch for it. Nor will anyone be able to say, ‘It is here’ or ‘It is there.’ For the kingdom of God is within you.” [
listen: there’s the verb]

Continue reading "Turning III: Turning and Following" »

Basho

Basho_1

Matsuo Basho is the universally acknowledged master of the Japanese form of poetry called haiku. He lived from 1644 to 1694, studied Chinese poetry, Taoism and Zen Buddhism, and for a time practiced Zen meditation. In his forties he began to travel, and set down his experiences in journals, the most well known of which is the classic of Japanese literature, Narrow Road to the Far North.

There is linear time and cyclical time, and then there is the no time of Zen Buddhism. While the haiku poetry of Basho and other masters of the form may not be Zen Buddhist in the sense that the poet was a practitioner of Zen--Basho is known to have studied Zen for a short time only--there is a deep affinity between the haiku form and the quality of consciousness or habit of mind associated with the Zen tradition. Robert Haas, who edited The Essential Haiku: Versions of Basho, Buson, & Issa (New York: Harper Collins, 1994), and translated most of the poems in that volume, wrote in a vein that is likely be more helpful to some of us than others:

In Basho's best poems, each individual moment of perception is all there is--or what there is, and at the same time, it isn't anything at all. There are different ways to say this, or parts of it--the world really seen is the world; every moment is eternal; or, every moment of time is all time; therefore time doesn't exist. In any case, after Basho, the genius of the form is the way in which through trained perception, it compresses the experiences of cyclical time, linear time, and the all time-no time of Zen into seventeen syllables.

Thus time (or no time) is of the essence in haiku: a single, evanescent moment of perception, of being, that also has its home in a traditional season of the year, and thus in the yearly cycle and its rituals: spring, summer, fall and winter. Collections of haiku--R.H. Blythe's is the classical four-volume set in English--are traditionally organized seasonally. I like Haas's speculation about the origin of this pattern:

My personal theory, not especially well-informed, about kigo [seasonal phrases] is that their origin is shamanic, animist, and ritualistic, that the words for "winter blast" and "spring blossoms" and "summer shower" were intended at one time to call forth the living spirits manifested in those natural phenomena.... The Chippewa's hunter's song, soliciting the spirit of the deer, is not very different from the Japanese poet soliciting the spirit of the cherry blossoms.

There are probably many published suggestions for reading haiku. Robert Haas writes with an erudition somewhat beyond my own, "Perhaps the best way . . . after one has familiarized oneself with the symbolism of the seasons and the Japanese habit of mind, is to read them as plainly and literally as possible."

To my mind, the most plausible idea is to approach haiku poems as nearly as possible in the spirit in which they were written. Linger. Haiku, perhaps more than any other literary form, asks for quiet attention. Here are some of the master Basho's own words, most of which, reflected upon, are as useful for living as for reading or writing poetry. (I repeat here the passage that summarizes better than anything I know the quality of mind I have called "earth consciousness." Some examples of Basho's haiku are included in my entry "Preliminary Notes on Earth Consciousness.")

Learn about pines from the pine, and about bamboo from the bamboo. In doing so, you must leave your subjective preoccupation with yourself. Otherwise you impose yourself on the object and do not learn. Your poetry issues of its own accord when you and the object have become one - when you have plunged deep enough into the object to see something like a hidden glimmering there. However well phrased your poetry may be, if your feeling is not natural - if the object and you are separate - then your poetry is not true poetry but merely your subjective counterfeit.

One must first of all concentrate one's thoughts on an object. Once one's mind achieves a state of concentration and the space between oneself and the object has disappeared, the essential nature of the object can be perceived...When you are composing a verse, let there not be a hair's breadth separating your mind from what you write.

The style I have is a light one both in form and in structure, like the impression of looking at the sandy bed of a shallow river.

The trouble with most poetry is that it is either subjective or objective.

Eat vegetable soup rather than duck stew.

October 08, 2006

Toward the Solstice

I have no reason to believe that the following poem of Adrienne Rich retained its significance to her in the years since its writing over thirty years ago. It was published in her volume, The Dream of a Common Language, containing poems written between 1974 and 1977, when she was in her mid-40s. She has not chosen subsequently to include it in collections of her work spanning over a half-century of writing.

But "Toward the Solstice" was of enduring importance to me as I grew awkwardly and circuitously  through the middle years of my life, and I often shared it with my students. It was written shortly after Rich's well-known and frequently anthologized poem, "Diving Into the Wreck," which I have included in the Journeys section of Reckonings. To read the two poems together is to recognize their kinship, the need to identify and seek reconciliation with the ghosts of our past, that we may continue the birthing of our lives. In another poem from the same period, "From an Old House in America," Rich writes:

Yet something hangs between us
Older and stranger than ourselves

Like a translucent curtain, a sheet of water
A dusty window

the irreducible, incomplete connection
between the dead and living
……
All my energy reaches out tonight
To comprehend a miracle beyond

raising the dead: the undead to watch
back on the road of birth.


I should add a brief note about the solstice, those two days in the cycle of the year for which the poet waits—summer and winter, the longest and shortest days of the year, marked immemorially by our ancestors as times of transition, awareness of naturally recurrent cycles, occasions for stock taking, heightened awareness, turning respectively toward the darkness and the light. In this poem, reflecting the poet’s consciousness of unfinished work, the imagery of the one tumbles repeatedly, cumulatively into that of the other.

Imagine:

Continue reading "Toward the Solstice" »

October 07, 2006

Not Ideas About The Thing, But The Thing Itself

I've asked myself what to do with this poem of Wallace Stevens that so draws me. Where do I most find its companionship? Not pinned beside my writing desk surely, where its mockery would quietly burn. As I wake and before I sleep; standing in a snowfall; letting go. Now that my imagination has awakened, why not beside my writing desk, so long as the pinning was in the spirit of vitality rather than stasis, fraternity rather than taxonomy?

NOT IDEAS ABOUT THE THING
BUT THE THING ITSELF

At the earliest ending of winter,
In March, a scrawny cry from outside
Seemed like a sound in his mind.

He knew that he heard it,
A bird’s cry, at daylight or before,
In the early March wind.

The sun was rising at six,
No longer a battered panache above snow…
It would have been outside.

It was not from the vast ventriloquism
Of sleep’s faded papier-maché…
The sun was coming from outside.

That scrawny cry—it was
A chorister whose c preceded the choir.
It was part of the colossal sun,

Surrounded by its choral rings,
Still far away. It was like
A new knowledge of reality.


- Wallace Stevens

Try to Praise the Mutilated World

Philoctetes, the central figure of Sophocles' play from which the subtitle of Reckonings is drawn, suffers from a kind of mutilation: a chronically suppurating wound that will not heal. Elsewhere in Reckonings I will write about the significance of Philoctetes's wound, its role in his life and in bringing to a close the long and bloody Trojan War. Here I want simply to note that woundedness is a part of being human and an increasingly evident characteristic of the earth itself. How we recognize those wounds, our own and those of the earth, how we bear them, experience the relationships between them and seek their healing, is critical to the character of our living and its effect on others. It is for good reason that the figure of "the wounded healer" is so resonant in the lives of physicians, psychotherapists, parents and others who bear responsibility for others' lives. W.H. Auden writes of loving with "a crooked heart." The chorus at the end of Philoctetes is

Half-ready to believe
That a crippled trust might walk.




The refrain of Adam Zagajewski's poem, "Try to Praise the Mutilated World," moves me in the same spirit:

Try to praise the mutilated world.
Remember June's long days,
and wild strawberries, drops of wine, the dew.
The nettles that methodically overgrow
the abandoned homesteads of exiles.
You must praise the mutilated world.
You watched the stylish yachts and ships;
one of them had a long trip ahead of it,
while salty oblivion awaited others.
You've seen the refugees heading nowhere,
you've heard the executioners sing joyfully.
You should praise the mutilated world.
Remember the moments when we were together
in a white room and the curtain fluttered.
Return in thought to the concert where music flared.
You gathered acorns in the park in autumn
and leaves eddied over the earth's scars.
Praise the mutilated world
and the gray feather a thrush lost,
and the gentle light that strays and vanishes
and returns.


(translated from the Polish by Clare Cavanagh)

Thoughts on a Zen Buddhist Parable

A well-known parable told by Buddha goes like this: A man, crossing a field, encounters a tiger. The man flees, the tiger pursues. Coming to a cliff top, the man grabs the root of a vine and swings himself down below the tiger's reach. The tiger waits. Looking down the precipice upon which he precariously swings, the man sees another tiger looking expectantly upwards at him. As if this were not sufficient cause for peril, two mice begin to chew the root from which he hangs. As he digests his unenviable condition, the man sees a ripe strawberry within his reach. Releasing the vine with one hand, he gently picks the strawberry with the other. How sweet it tasted!


Teaching tales are a wonderful part of many wisdom traditions, including Sufism, Taoism, Hasidic Judaism, the life of Jesus as manifest in the New Testament, and the stories of the desert fathers of early Christianity. Like this Zen parable, they lend themselves to meditation and revisiting. When I first read this story, in my twenties, I took it at reasonable face value: a doomed man's capacity to pluck a last moment of pleasure before imminent and certain death. Having no experience of such, I nonetheless imagined that there was nothing like such inevitability to focus and heighten one's sensibilities. Years later, ruminating on the story again while preparing to discuss it with a group of students, I wrote in my journal, "Can I, in the midst of all that distracts and destroys, with no hope of release from such circumstances, reach out to taste the fruit of life? I have a fierce and, I think, irredeemable tendency to hold on tighter to what I've learned to know as dear life. Perhaps, if I will not let go, I can at least learn to grasp with only one hand, leaving the other to reach out freely."

Now, later in life, I am more inclined to hear the tale as a nudge towards recognition of the evanescence of time in contrast to a world more and more compelled by the tyranny of time's presence and precision. None of my readings is lost. I live, as Stanley Kunitz writes elsewhere, "in the layers," and I too am not done with my changes.

There is a brief Sufi tale whose characters are not unlike those of this Zen parable:

A man being followed by a hungry tiger turned in desperation to face it, and cried: 'Why don't you leave me alone?' The tiger answered: 'Why don't you stop being so appetizing?'

Telling Stories, Saying Poems

I believe in parables. I navigate life using stories where I find them, and I hold tight to the ones that tell me new kinds of truth.

- Barbara Kingsolver


LascauxThe impulse to tell and listen to stories, the poetic pattern of cycle, repetition, movement and simile, is one with that of image-making, and surely is as old as humankind. Witness the Neolithic picture writing, at once familiar and mysterious, on cave walls at Lascaux in France and Altamira in northern Spain. The stuff of our imagination, we sometimes think, was laid down in early childhood, or drawn forth as sensibility matures, and there is truth in both of those convictions. But imagination is also older and more profound, and we come upon it, are moved by it and find new meaning in it, if we are open to a gift that is more primordial than our conscious minds can encompass.

The great German scholar of India's history, Heinrich Zimmer, reminded us that the disparaging word "dilettante" is derived from the Italian verb dilettare, "to take delight in." Coleridge's phrase, "willing suspension of disbelief," suggests something of that life-giving spirit. The world of soul and imagination is at once illimitable and inexhaustible, like the gift of manna, the casks of wine at Cana, like the perennial imp and shape-shifter, Coyote. In that spirit, consciousness is most truly nourished, the old stories and the new are most truly received, transformed, passed on afresh, the seeds, in Zimmer's words, "waiting to be touched.... reappear.... as fresh and green as before."

I want to initiate this section of Reckonings with one of Stanley Kunitz's poems, so it is appropriate to end this introduction with his own words: "Poetry is ultimately mythology, the telling of the stories of the soul. The old myths, the old gods, the old heroes have never died. They are only sleeping at the bottom of our minds, waiting for our call. We have need of them, never more desperately than now, for in their sum they epitomize the wisdom and experience of the race. At every true act of the imagination, whether in art or science, they stir fitfully."

Jack_pine_on_graniteThese pages will come to harbor other poems, brief stories and other short prose, juxtaposed with images that may in turn suggest a stream of association, a poetic or narrative response. The fragment of jack pine in my photograph here, shaped by age and weather into such intriguing form, rests on a hospitable granite shelf, itself cracked, rounded and molded by ice, rain, wind and sun. Jack pine exposed at high altitude in the mountains of New England grows slowly. Its shapes bear the marks of its home and history, much like the coastal cypress of northern California.

We begin, then--not only for the sake of its title--with Stanley Kunitz's loving and painful response to a child's hard question, a tender plea for forgiveness and an evocation of the inextricability of life, love, art and language.

Stanley_kunitz_1 Kunitz died last spring, 100 years old. He served some time ago as Consultant in Poetry to the Library of Congress, a position that until recently was known as U.S. Poet Laureate, and he won virtually every prize in the literary pantheon, from the arbiters of prosody and from his fellow poets. His poems have been my close companions for thirty years.



THE RECKONING

"What have you done?"

Pigeon, who are to me
Language and light
And the long flight home,
Your question comes with coils
Like years behind,
Which I am crawling from.
Be patient with my wound:
Too long I lay
In the folds of my preparation,
Sinuous in the sun,
A golden skin,
All pride, sores, excretion,
Blazing with death. O child,
From my angry side
Tumbles this agate heart,
Your prize, veined with the root
Of guilty life,
From which flow love and art.